Quantcast
Skip Navigation
Judging the Environment judicial nominations photo
 

A joint project tracking federal judicial nominations and courts.



 

What's New

Historic Win for the Environment: The Supreme Court Addresses Global Warming

In a narrow 5-4 ruling (Massachusetts v. EPA) the Supreme Court for the first time recognized carbon dioxide as a major contributor to global warming and ruled that the EPA has the authority to regulate tail pipe emissions.  Chief Justice Roberts and Associate Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito joined dissenting opinions that would have denied Massachusetts access to the high court and would have ruled that the air pollutant most responsible for climate change cannot be regulated under the Clean Air Act.

Editorials and Opinion


Nominees

Issues

    Clean Water
    Polluter lawsuits are trying to effectively repeal the Clean Water Act for up to 60 percent of the nation's streams, creeks, and rivers. In light of recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions and administrative actions that are jeopardizing federal water pollution protections, Congress is considering the Clean Water Protection Act to reaffirm Congress' intent to protect all waters of the United States.
    Fair Pay for Federal Judges
    The effectiveness of our federal courts depends on our ability to attract the most exceptional lawyers to become federal judges and then keep them on the bench to administer our laws.
    Takings Law
    The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that “private property [shall not] be taken for public use, without just compensation.”